Classes: suggestions for improvement

Kam kasravi kamkasravi at
Mon Jun 13 10:33:29 PDT 2011

On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:49 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at> wrote:

> On Jun 12, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
>> I’ve only got one use case for this, but “class methods” would also work better if they could be attached to the prototype (and subject to inheritance) instead of the constructor.
> We had a thread about this, because Ruby and CoffeeScript (which translates to JS and copies properties to do "constructor inheritance") both support class method inheritance.
> Putting class methods on the prototype mixes up is-a relations, making the class constructor delegate to the class prototype. That breaks constructor is-a function in general. Better to have two parallel proto-chains, one from subclass prototype to superclass prototype, the other from subclass constructor to superclass constructor.

Is the constructor calling implicit if not specified? For example both c++ and java will call super() implicitly if there is no explicit call for the subtype constructor.

> /be
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at

More information about the es-discuss mailing list