Wanted: standard Array function to append an array's

Andrea Giammarchi andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com
Fri Jul 29 05:01:49 PDT 2011

I may be late here, but what's wrong with

firstArray = firstArray.concat(secondArray); ?

If there are still problems I would say no "magic method" can solve them,
isn't it?

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Jeff Walden <jwalden+es at mit.edu> wrote:

> On 07/27/2011 01:26 PM, John-David Dalton wrote:
>> @Jeff In reply to
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/**pipermail/es-discuss/2011-**July/016124.html<https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2011-July/016124.html>
>> ,
>> which engines have problems with `firstArray.push.apply(**firstArray,
>> secondArray)` ?
>> Shouldn't a bug report be filed for the specific JS engine or the spec
>> be clarified on the subject (String.fromCharCode too) instead of
>> adding another method to Array.prototype?
> Here's a testcase:
> (function test() { var big =  [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0xa, 0xb, 0xc,
> 0xd, 0xe, 0xf]; while (true) { try { var before = big.length;
> big.push.apply(big, big); if (big.length !== before + before) throw before;
> } catch (e) { return big.length + ": " + e; } } })()
> If the apply call throws an exception, a string consisting of the array
> length before the push failed, and the exception thrown, is returned.  If
> the push call doesn't push all the elements it should have pushed,a string
> consisting of the array length after the push, and the array length before
> the faulty push, is returned.
> The testcase demonstrates failures with these engines:
> SpiderMonkey's max argument-count is currently something like 480k, so
> pushing an array of 512k elements onto another array will only push the
> first 480k-ish.  (This is being changed so that an exception is thrown,
> shortly.  It has caused at least two quite unexpected bugs.  Probably
> someone else has stumbled across the problem before, but I don't know for
> sure.)
> In v8 an exception is thrown sometime between secondArray having length
> 128k and 256k.
> Nitro copied SpiderMonkey, although its max-arg-count isn't as high as
> SpiderMonkey's, so it will only push the first N elements of a really big
> array.
> IE10 throws an exception for a push of the elements of an array somewhere
> between 128k and 256k.
> IE9 throws similarly, except between 256k and 512k.
> Of the major engines, only Opera seems to have no problems here.  I'm not
> sure why this is.  But ignoring Opera, everyone fails this.  And the reason,
> I believe, is not that it's a quality of implementation issue: it's that the
> general way to implement this butts up against ingrained implementation
> choices, and different engines will quite rationally behave in different
> ways in response.  push.apply is simply not a reliable substitute for a
> built-in method to push the contents of an array into another array.
> Jeff
> ______________________________**_________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/es-discuss<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20110729/15c3e332/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list