Pure win: Array.from and Array.of
dherman at mozilla.com
Sun Jul 10 13:33:03 PDT 2011
I mentioned two benefits I can see to Array.of over -literals here:
1) With Array.of you know you aren't going to accidentally create holes, and
2) if you're passing it to a higher-order function you know you aren't going to trip over the single-uint32-arg special case.
That said, the "readability" story you and I tweeted about is not so compelling given that, in the first-order usage pattern an array-literal is strictly more readable. So a longer name like Array.fromElements or something might be okay.
On Jul 10, 2011, at 10:33 AM, Rick Waldron wrote:
> _that_ is the compelling use-case I was looking for.
> -- Sent from my Palm Pre
> On Jul 10, 2011 1:23 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.com> wrote:
> On Jul 10, 2011, at 10:18 AM, Rick Waldron wrote:
>> The more I think about it, I still can't come up with any really exciting use cases where Array.of would outshine anything that already exists. I say strike it from the wishlist.
> Higher-order programming with Array as constructing-function bites back for the single-number-argument case. That's where Array.of helps.
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss