Pure win: Array.from and Array.of
Dmitry A. Soshnikov
dmitry.soshnikov at gmail.com
Sun Jul 10 10:35:13 PDT 2011
On 10.07.2011 21:32, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
> On Jul 10, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
>> On Jul 10, 2011, at 10:18 AM, Rick Waldron wrote:
>>> The more I think about it, I still can't come up with any really
>>> exciting use cases where Array.of <http://Array.of/> would outshine
>>> anything that already exists. I say strike it from the wishlist.
>> Higher-order programming with Array as constructing-function bites
>> back for the single-number-argument case. That's where Array.of helps.
> Yes, if you actually need to pass Array.of as a function argument. Of
> course if we have block lambdas you could just say:
> instead of
Can you show a real use-case of it please?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss