Public/private namespaces in harmony classes proposal

Juan Ignacio Dopazo dopazo.juan at gmail.com
Fri Jul 8 08:45:57 PDT 2011


On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.com> wrote:

> On Jul 8, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Juan Ignacio Dopazo wrote:
>
> My first thought was: why not just statically replace this.x, with private
> x, with this[xPrivateName] and forget about accessing private properties
> of other objects? That would still leave the problem of closures inside
> methods, though...
>
>
> If xPrivateName is a private name object, then there's no reason to "forget
> about accessing private properties of other objects". Both
> this[xPrivateName] and other[xPrivateName] work as you would expect.
>
> /be
>
You are very much right. What are the open issues with privates in classes
then?

Juan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20110708/98ce5b8e/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list