Public/private namespaces in harmony classes proposal

Juan Ignacio Dopazo dopazo.juan at gmail.com
Fri Jul 8 06:36:57 PDT 2011


On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.com> wrote:

> On Jul 7, 2011, at 11:07 PM, Gavin Barraclough wrote:
>
> > Ah, I see.  It's a fair point, but isn't this already a hazard that the
> language faces?
>
> Not with private names.
>
> There's also something that was probably discussed but never got to this
list:

Private instance properties were considered to be accessible by all
instances of the class. That's a new concept in ES. Were there arguments for
keeping instance private properties private to the instance?

Juan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20110708/b29abc7f/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list