/\1/ could be a valid RegExp through Chapter 16 Extension clause?
barraclough at apple.com
Thu Jul 7 14:58:51 PDT 2011
On Jul 7, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Lasse Reichstein wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 21:17:17 +0200, Mike Samuel <
>> One way to tell whether the group initialized to empty works on an
>> interpreter is to test
>> which is true in most interpreters, but false in Rhino1.7 and Chrome12.
> I do believe it should be false
Yep, this is our understanding too (and we agree with the same results).
More information about the es-discuss