/\1/ could be a valid RegExp through Chapter 16 Extension clause?
reichsteinatwork at gmail.com
Thu Jul 7 14:40:47 PDT 2011
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 21:17:17 +0200, Mike Samuel <mikesamuel at gmail.com>
> One way to tell whether the group initialized to empty works on an
> interpreter is to test
> which is true in most interpreters, but false in Rhino1.7 and Chrome12.
I do believe it should be false. The captures are cleared for each
of a quantified atom (RepeatMatcher in section 188.8.131.52, step 4), so the
always be non-participating (and match the empty string).
> Interestingly other perl 5 interpreters
I don't think ES RegExps should count as a PCRE :)
Lasse Reichstein Holst Nielsen - reichsteinatwork at gmail.com
More information about the es-discuss