Alternative proposal to privateName.public

David Bruant bruant.d at gmail.com
Thu Dec 22 05:29:53 PST 2011


Le 22/12/2011 13:20, Tom Van Cutsem a écrit :
> At first, I shared Andreas's concern about introducing a flag in
> feature X that only seems to affect a superficially unrelated feature Y.
>
> However, having skimmed the private names page, I stumbled upon a
> section that seems to want to introduce precisely such a flag for
> different but related purposes:
> <http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:private_name_objects#possible_visibility_flag>
>
> Having also just read about the different use cases of "private" names
> versus just "unique" names,
Can you give a link to or describe these uses cases? It will make easier
(at least to me) understanding your proposal and compare it with other
proposals.

Thanks,

David


More information about the es-discuss mailing list