"Approx-equal" operator

Dmitry Soshnikov dmitry.soshnikov at gmail.com
Mon Dec 19 02:50:28 PST 2011


Thanks Jorge, yes, similarly this conclusion was in my memory too.

Dmitry.

On 19.12.2011 13:53, Jorge wrote:
> On 19/12/2011, at 10:10, Dmitry Soshnikov wrote:
>> Have we already planned paren-free calls? Seems I missed approved strawman.
>
> Only for block lambdas, if I'm not mistaken:
>
> <https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2011-May/014595.html>
>
> <quote>
>> 3) Should paren free calls be introduced?
> I'm not proposing this in general, and I do not believe anyone else on TC39 will.
>
> /be
> </quote>
>
>
> There's this too:
> <https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2011-May/014587.html>
>
> <quote>
> "You're ignoring the goal of providing paren-free block-argument call syntax for control abstractions that look like built-in control-flow statements."
> </quote>
>
> The thread was "block lambda revival":
> <https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2011-May/thread.html#14563>
>
> Cheers,



More information about the es-discuss mailing list