dmitry.soshnikov at gmail.com
Mon Dec 19 02:50:28 PST 2011
Thanks Jorge, yes, similarly this conclusion was in my memory too.
On 19.12.2011 13:53, Jorge wrote:
> On 19/12/2011, at 10:10, Dmitry Soshnikov wrote:
>> Have we already planned paren-free calls? Seems I missed approved strawman.
> Only for block lambdas, if I'm not mistaken:
>> 3) Should paren free calls be introduced?
> I'm not proposing this in general, and I do not believe anyone else on TC39 will.
> There's this too:
> "You're ignoring the goal of providing paren-free block-argument call syntax for control abstractions that look like built-in control-flow statements."
> The thread was "block lambda revival":
More information about the es-discuss