"not a Date object" vs. "not an object with [[Class]] of ''Date''"
dmitry.soshnikov at gmail.com
Sat Oct 2 10:09:10 PDT 2010
Ok, here's also implemented meta-constructor. Constructors created by this
meta-constructor may produce also objects with specified [[Class]].
Additionally I made a sugar with inheriting from passed
It may be found here: http://gist.github.com/607668
Again, non-standard __proto__ is used to inject the needed prototype
(however, at implementation level it doesn't matter).
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Dmitry A. Soshnikov <
dmitry.soshnikov at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02.10.2010 17:29, Brendan Eich wrote:
>> On Sep 6, 2010, at 1:43 AM, Dmitry A. Soshnikov wrote:
>> For what to create a proxy? It's only for catch-traps (yes, it may be
>>> used additionally to create a _catcher_ with "Array" [[Class]], but without
>>> additions -- i.e. if a user wants just to inherit from Array.prototype and
>>> to have all arrays' stuff -- proxies are not needed to him).
>> Proxies are required to update length to be one greater than index
>> (property name-string P such that ToString(ToUint32(P)) == P and ToUint32(P)
>> is not 2^32 - 1) when setting an indexed property. Array's magic [[Put]] is
>> not inherited.
> Yep, true, but if we have ability to specify the [[Class]] -- we'll have
> overloaded [[DefineOwnProperty] (or [[Put]] in ES3).
> Here's this ad-hoc (with using __proto__ injection) implementation:
> By the way, at first glance, the ability to specify [[Class]] with using
> first level of inheritance is not so convenient and needed. Because with the
> same success we may create a simple array and augment it with needed
> properties. However, starting from the second and later inheritance levels
> -- it may be convenient.
> This is if to talk about prototypal inheritance. If to consider class-based
> inheritance (that is, with using constructors), possibly it can be sense in
> the special meta-constructor (a constructor of constructors) which may
> specify, objects of what kind (of what [[Class]]) a newly created
> constructor may produce.
> P.S.: in addition, the Proxy constructor may also accept className
> parameter. But repeat -- proxies are needed to trap the property access. If
> a user just want to have Array.prototype in inheritance chain and at the
> same time have an object of the "Array" kind, he just creates it with
> specifying this kind. He don't need to write a proxy's handler for that.
> Howerver, if he does need the catcher -- he creates a proxy of "Array" kind.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss