Colons and other annotative characters

David Herman dherman at
Mon Nov 22 16:31:21 PST 2010

> I somehow suspect stringifying the iterator next() return value from for-in machinery will not placate folks who want for-in not to be metaprogrammable.

Nor would it work -- you wouldn't be able to get the values() or properties() iteration behavior, for example. It would be the worst of all possible compromises.

> But harmony:proxies is already spec'ed with an enumerate trap. Something does not add up. You're right that the line between your items (2) and (3) is arbitrary.



More information about the es-discuss mailing list