Negative indices for arrays
Dmitry A. Soshnikov
dmitry.soshnikov at gmail.com
Fri Nov 12 00:39:37 PST 2010
On 12.11.2010 1:21, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Peter van der Zee [mailto:ecma at qfox.nl]
>> I guess I would like -n to map to length-n, but I'm not sure whether it's worth the
>> cost described above. After all, it's just sugar.
> Like Oliver also said.
Like everybody on this list understands _what_ it is.
> This isn't just sugar, it is a deep semantic change to the interpretation of property names
As I see it:
1. if to consider only for arrays -- it's a minimal semantics changes
and minimal backward compats.
2. if to make it generic, we need another syntax.
What do you suggest?
More information about the es-discuss