Module system strawpersons
kamkasravi at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 18 18:14:19 PST 2010
I guess Brendan is saying that if a continuation was natively built ar the '.' then the risk is that not acquiring the resource would result in a zombie. But if the runtime could build a continuation at the '.' then it could come back to it when the resource was acquired. Brendan is that layman's description or did I get it wrong?
On Jan 18, 2010, at 5:52 PM, ihab.awad at gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Oliver Hunt <oliver at apple.com> wrote:
It's also horrific in the context of a browser as it's effectively an arbitrary
length call blocked on IO.
That's a good description of what I was proposing. Yes it would block
the event loop. Perhaps it could be useful if (say) the module were
available in a local disk cache but not loaded into memory: the cost
of I/O to a disk cache may be reasonable, but not the cost of a
completely new fetch from the network.
Ihab A.B. Awad, Palo Alto, CA
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss at mozilla.org
More information about the es-discuss