brendan at mozilla.com
Mon Jan 18 09:00:24 PST 2010
On Jan 18, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
> Tobie et al. may want to, but I know many *users* of Prototype who
> do not. We're talking about a large number of actual uses, some of
> which might want to migrate into a module, not necessarily be used
> cross-module. The cost of doing so is low if primordials in that
> module can be mutated. It goes way up if they can't.
> Huh? I don't understand this. If they wish to be in the same mutated-
> primordial-sandbox as Prototype, as you indicate and seems likely,
> then it would not help them if Prototype were packaged as a module
No, I wrote "migrate into a module" meaning be part of the inside of a
module -- not be packaged as a module.
> and modules were the unit of primordial-mutation-sandboxing. Why
> should they not just load the existing Prototype into their frame
> the old fashioned way?
> Or, yes, they could do the Valija thing, in order to multiplex a
> frame among multiple sandboxes. But a Valija sandbox is not a
> module. I think we're confusing levels.
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss