simple modules

[David Herman]

I like it. I might prefer "module loader" for a bit more concreteness. But it has the benefit of concreteness and familiarity.

Dave

On Feb 3, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Mark Miller wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:11 PM, David Herman <dherman at mozilla.com> wrote:
> > Well, a "module system" is a language construct that provides modules. I think "sandbox" sort of suggests more isolation than is necessarily provided. PLT Scheme uses the worst possible name for the concept (I won't even say what it is, it's so awful).
> >
> > I'll think about alternatives and update the wiki.
> 
> How about "module group"?
> 
> Since, AFAICT, the concept being named here, in Java, corresponds to a ClassLoader, I suggest "loader". (E calls these "loaders" as well.)
> 
> 
>  
> Dave
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain
> 
>    Cheers,
>    --MarkM
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20100203/8d0ee27a/attachment.html>