three small proposals: the bikeshed cometh!
brendan at mozilla.com
Thu Apr 29 14:40:44 PDT 2010
On Apr 29, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Alex Russell wrote:
>>> One wag replied after I had people vote on these "what about
>>> voting on
>>> function"? Many hands then went up, more than for any of the
>>> above. This set
>>> the cat among the shorthand-promoting pigeons.
>> None of the options you provided had the contours of the proposed
>> solution, so it's not clear that the lack of support for your
>> proposals commutes to lack of support for this one.
> Define "contours" -- do you mean # instead of λ or ƒ, or the
> (separate, I agree, but problematic) completion-value is implicit
> return value idea? We've discussed both here over the years, but I
> admit my two straw polls at conferences didn't cover the latter.
The JSConf audience poll did provoke someone to suggest "fun", and I
mentioned "fn" (the ML family languages have both). Two letters or
three might be few enough, and avoid the line-noise and can't-type-
More information about the es-discuss