Web IDL Garden Hose (was: ECMA TC 39 / W3C HTML and WebApps WG coordination)

Mark S. Miller erights at google.com
Sat Sep 26 15:43:30 PDT 2009

On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam at mcc.id.au> wrote:
> Indeed, much of the custom [[Get]] etc. functionality can be turned into
> ES5 meta-object stuff.  A pertinent question is then: should we change
> Web IDL to specify an ES5 binding (and not ES3) at this point, given
> that specs depending on it want to advance along the Rec track?

Since ES5 will be officially done well ahead of HTML5, I don't see why
not. But I do not know what your "Rec track" constraints imply.


More information about the es-discuss mailing list