"Pretty" function expression names

[Dan Tsimbala]

>
> On the other hand, this is also just using one syntactic feature (string
> literal) for another purpose: a special type of comment.
>

So why not do it as the first comment of the function, like Python does.
String literal seems strange. But in any case I like this idea more than
descriptive names.

The only problem for me is that it might overlap with for example JSDoc
comments, and with string literal you can't do anything about it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20090511/498d4967/attachment.html>