tobie.langel at gmail.com
Thu Mar 12 14:25:49 PDT 2009
On Mar 12, 2009, at 21:54 , P T Withington wrote:
> I think we are a long way from needing serialize/deserialize
> arbitrary Objects. Having JSON should suffice.
> starting to change the representation to be more like the high-level
This seems similar to the needs of the objective-j folks (as expressed
in the "name property for built-in functions??" thread).
> But, I would very much like to see a standard way to discover an
> Object's constructor, and a way to enumerate _all_ the properties of
> an object.
Again, I'm very interested in the former. And doing away with the
Object.prototype.toString.call(obj) trick for built-in types would be
a good thing.
Could we possibly imagine having a non-[[Writable]] and non-
[[Configurable]] 'name' property of built-in constructors whose value
would be [[Class]] ?
More information about the Es-discuss