watkins at apple.com
Mon Mar 9 09:35:59 PDT 2009
Garrett, I gave a specific use case for why I'd like to be able to
specify the name on an anonymous function: wrapping an existing
function with pre- or post-call behaviour.
I don't think the desire to trigger a function on change of a value is
at all ludicrous. I think we should cut Memolus some slack for not
being at his most articulate.
On 8 Mar, 2009, at 6:51 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
> Memolus does not say what he needs this for, but it sounds even more
> ludicrous than the recent discussion to allow [[Writable]] name to
> anonymous function objects created in a certain way because the
> "Objective-J" folks wanted it (what was that use case?)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Es-discuss