name property for built-in functions??
Mark S. Miller
erights at google.com
Wed Mar 4 13:54:50 PST 2009
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <
Allen.Wirfs-Brock at microsoft.com> wrote:
> > I'm fine with dropping the Function name property from 3.1
> I think that might be best, although we would still need to define the
> toString name for all possible function creation scenarios.
> +1. When in doubt, leave it out. Nothing else in the spec depends on
<function>.name, nor do any of the real goals for ES3.1.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Es-discuss