name property for built-in functions??

Mark S. Miller erights at google.com
Wed Mar 4 13:54:50 PST 2009


On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <
Allen.Wirfs-Brock at microsoft.com> wrote:

>  > I'm fine with dropping the Function name property from 3.1
>
> I think that might be best, although we would still need to define the
> toString name for all possible function creation scenarios.
>
> +1. When in doubt, leave it out. Nothing else in the spec depends on
<function>.name, nor do any of the real goals for ES3.1.


-- 
   Cheers,
   --MarkM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20090304/936e6a2b/attachment.html>


More information about the Es-discuss mailing list