JSON parser grammar
douglas at crockford.com
Wed Jun 3 15:59:17 PDT 2009
Waldemar Horwat wrote:
> Here are my views on this.
>> 2) Do we want to permit conforming implementations to extend the JSON
>> grammar that they recognize? This probably could be done by extending
>> the syntax error extension allowance in section 16 to include the JSON
>> grammar. If we allow this then most of the observed variation for the
>> current emerging implementation that we have been talking about would
>> probably be acceptable extensions.
JSON is done. JSON will not be revised. Someday it might be replaced and
that replacement will have a different name and likely a different model.
Chapter 16 should not give a license to fiddle with the JSON grammar.
More information about the es-discuss