Mark S. Miller
erights at google.com
Thu Sep 18 07:35:49 PDT 2008
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs at apple.com> wrote:
> I think it is a tenable position that 1.5m === 1.5000m based on the
> "cohort" concept, since performing the same operation on both will give
> answers that are in the same "cohort" equivalence class. But 1.5 / 10.0 !=
> 1.5m / 10.0, and indeed, the answers would not even be in the same cohort. A
> notion of 'cohort' equivalence class based on correspondence in the abstract
> to the same real number but divorced from the actual semantics of the
> programming language strikes me as incoherent. I think such a notion of
> equivalence class only makes sense if performing identical operations on
> members of the same cohort gives answers which are in the same cohort.
Are -0 and 0 in the same cohort?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Es-discuss