Hoisting behaviour of 'const' and 'let'

David-Sarah Hopwood david.hopwood at industrial-designers.co.uk
Sun Oct 12 12:01:40 PDT 2008


Mark S. Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 7:07 AM, David-Sarah Hopwood
> <david.hopwood at industrial-designers.co.uk> wrote:
>>      * if 'const' has the same hoisting behaviour as 'let', then we
>>        don't need a separate 'let const'.
> 
> Indeed. "let const" is long dead. Someone needs to clean up the wiki.

Someone needs to enable the wiki to be cleaned up, by making it editable
by us ordinary mortals.

-- 
David-Sarah Hopwood


More information about the Es-discuss mailing list