Hoisting behaviour of 'const' and 'let'

David-Sarah Hopwood david.hopwood at industrial-designers.co.uk
Sun Oct 12 12:01:40 PDT 2008

Mark S. Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 7:07 AM, David-Sarah Hopwood
> <david.hopwood at industrial-designers.co.uk> wrote:
>>      * if 'const' has the same hoisting behaviour as 'let', then we
>>        don't need a separate 'let const'.
> Indeed. "let const" is long dead. Someone needs to clean up the wiki.

Someone needs to enable the wiki to be cleaned up, by making it editable
by us ordinary mortals.

David-Sarah Hopwood

More information about the Es-discuss mailing list