Hoisting behaviour of 'const' and 'let'

Mark S. Miller erights at google.com
Sun Oct 12 10:38:16 PDT 2008

On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 7:07 AM, David-Sarah Hopwood
<david.hopwood at industrial-designers.co.uk> wrote:
>      * if 'const' has the same hoisting behaviour as 'let', then we
>        don't need a separate 'let const'.

Indeed. "let const" is long dead. Someone needs to clean up the wiki.


More information about the Es-discuss mailing list