Allen.Wirfs-Brock at microsoft.com
Sun Nov 16 13:31:54 PST 2008
In principle I agree. However, ECMA has its own usage guidelines that we will need to make sure we conform with.
>From: es-discuss-bounces at mozilla.org [mailto:es-discuss-
>bounces at mozilla.org] On Behalf Of Peter Michaux
>Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 1:27 PM
>To: es-discuss at mozilla.org
>Subject: Re: Kona [[DefaultValue]]
>On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Peter Michaux <petermichaux at gmail.com>
>> Also is it "should" or "must"? RFC documents are usually very strict
>> about defining "should" etc and I don't see a definition of "should"
>> before page 41 of the pdf where this use occurs.
>I think explicitly adopting these definitions would be a good step in
>improving the clarity of the ECMAScript standard.
>Other recent standards have referenced this rfc explicitly, For example,
>Es-discuss mailing list
>Es-discuss at mozilla.org
More information about the Es-discuss