destructuring in formal parameters?
brendan at mozilla.com
Thu Nov 13 16:42:55 PST 2008
On Nov 13, 2008, at 3:33 PM, Peter Michaux wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.com>
>> IIRC formal parameter destructuring was Harmonious when I presented
>> it in
> Is there a published list of things which are considered "harmonious"?
You asked last time and I answered:
The only changes since then have been visible on es-discuss -- mainly
lambda, lexical scope, and the agreement to use an unambiguous bottom-
up grammar, which rules out expression closures as proposed (and
The http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:strawman is the
place to look.
> I'm particularly curious how lambdas have be received by the technical
> committee members after the long discussions and also classes as
I missed the last TC39 meeting, but the reaction on the list from Mark
Miller has been positive (indeed, instrumental in the case of lambdas).
More information about the Es-discuss