Draft of Function.prototype.bind.

Maciej Stachowiak mjs at apple.com
Mon Nov 3 20:16:06 PST 2008


On Nov 3, 2008, at 8:01 PM, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote:

> Brendan Eich wrote:
>> On Nov 3, 2008, at 6:50 PM, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote:
>>
>>> That is, native objects that implement [[Call]] must be functions.
>>
>> No, see 16, second list, second bullet:
>>
>> "An implementation may provide additional types, values, objects,
>> properties, and functions beyond those described in this  
>> specification.
>> This may cause constructs (such as looking up a variable in the  
>> global
>> scope) to have implementation-defined behaviour instead of throwing  
>> an
>> error (such as ReferenceError)."
>
> So what does "Objects that implement this internal method are called
> functions." in the description of [[Call]] mean, then? If it is not
> true for native objects (which is what the section claims to be  
> describing),
> then it is simply incorrect.

It's saying you can call anything that's callable a function, or  
perhaps even loosely defining a term "function".

But this does not guarantee that typeof returns "function", that the  
internal [[Class]] property has the value "Function", or that  
Function.prototype is in the prototype chain, among other potentially  
useful properties.

The rest of the spec doesn't usually refer to the property of being a  
function without further explanation, since it is unclear which of  
these things are intended.

Regards,
Maciej




More information about the Es-discuss mailing list