Forwards-compatible syntax proposal

[Mike Shaver]

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at opera.com> wrote:
> Given that, something what Ian suggests makes sense I think for the
> transition periods to an improved version of the language.

That could be, but Waldemar seems to think that it's not possible due
to regexp (and E4X?) syntax.  I tend to side with Waldemar on
syntactic details, but I'm sure he would be as happy as me for someone
to show a way around it.

Mike