ES3.1 Object static methods rationale document
Allen Wirfs-Brock
Allen.Wirfs-Brock at microsoft.com
Wed Jul 16 14:36:27 PDT 2008
Just wait, "reify" may yet end up as the last name standing...
-----Original Message-----
From: es4-discuss-bounces at mozilla.org [mailto:es4-discuss-bounces at mozilla.org] On Behalf Of Brendan Eich
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 2:27 PM
To: David Flanagan
Cc: es4-discuss at mozilla.org es4-discuss
Subject: Re: ES3.1 Object static methods rationale document
On Jul 16, 2008, at 1:41 PM, David Flanagan wrote:
> Brendan, I think you were correct when you originally wrote:
>
>> lookup : define :: get : put.
>
> I think that lookupProperty is much nicer than describeProperty, since
> "lookup" captures the getter nature of the method in a way that
> "describe" does not.
Connotations are many, ambiguity without a noun phrase (not just
overloaded old "property") saying what's being "got" or "described"
or "looked up" is inevitable. This means the stolid, safe name
"getPropertyDescriptor" is least likely to confuse.
I see what you mean about describe in the context of setting a
description (depict in a graphics context is problematic too) --
thanks. Thesaurus doesn't include mental concept filtering, dammit.
I'm sure we'll get this right, but I'm also pretty sure "getProperty"
isn't the droid we are seeking.
/be
_______________________________________________
Es4-discuss mailing list
Es4-discuss at mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
More information about the Es4-discuss
mailing list