Two interoperable implementations rule
Mark S. Miller
erights at google.com
Tue Jul 15 04:07:45 PDT 2008
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Mike Shaver <mike.shaver at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs at apple.com> wrote:
> > [...] For example, would Rhino and SpiderMonkey count as
> > sufficiently independent implementations?
> Similarly, if we end up with, f.e., both WebKit and Spidermonkey using
> decNumber as our internal implementation of Decimal, does that count
> as two interoperable implementations? It seems like we'd be at risk
> of mostly testing that code against itself, so I would hope that we
> look for such reuse cases when we're making sure that we actually have
> usefully-distinct implementations of features to validate the spec.
Adding decimal to Rhino would presumably build on the BigDecimal class
already present in Java. Is Java's BigDecimal class sufficiently conformant
to the relevant IEEE spec to support a conformant implementation of the
decimal proposed for EcmaScript? And is the implementation sufficiently
independent of the implementation the IBM guys might add to WebKit or
Spidermonkey to count as a cross check on the spec? IBM guys, would you be
interested in contributing such a decimal implementation to Rhino?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Es4-discuss