Newly revised Section 10 for ES3.1.

[Mike Shaver]

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock
<Allen.Wirfs-Brock at microsoft.com> wrote:
>>> FWIW, this sort of thing is a reason that I'm pretty concerned about
> ES3.1 getting into an advanced specification state without the benefit
> of any in-browser implementation.
>
> You need to have an advance specification state before you can meaningfully test it in an implementation.

Sure, there's an interdependency, but it seems like you wouldn't want
to propose something for inclusion into a short-turn spec like ES3.1
unless you'd seen it run _somewhere_ relevant, no?  Is there a
document somewhere that tracks which ES3.1 features have been
implemented in what prototype engine?

Some of the features of ES3.1 (such as the library additions) seem
like they are individually into an advanced specification state, so
perhaps they're where to start?

Mike