Newly revised Section 10 for ES3.1.

[Brendan Eich]

On Jul 9, 2008, at 6:58 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote:

> Hi Maciej, IIUC, these examples work the same in Allen's proposal  
> as the do in ES4. If this does break the web, doesn't ES4 have  
> exactly the same problem?

The idea for ES4 was to change the meaning of function sub-statements  
only under opt-in versioning. Implementations would do whatever they  
do today without an explicit type="application/ecmascript;version=4"  
or equivalent "application/javascript;version=2" on the script tag.

/be