Allen's lambda syntax proposal

Yuh-Ruey Chen maian330 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 8 01:01:43 PST 2008


Breton Slivka wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Michael Day <mikeday at yeslogic.com> wrote:
>
> > (1) Expression lambdas: lambdas whose body is an expression.
> >
> > var x = lambda(y, z) y + z
> >
> > Solves the problem with completion leakage, solves the nested
> > return/break/continue issue. However, quite limited in usage, and makes it
> > difficult to use lambdas to replace functions as they can't contain loop
> > statements. (Hello, recursion! :)
>
> [snip]
>
> 2) It would be really nice to have a callable value that was
> garaunteed not to have side effects. a lambda with an expression body
> might not be that. Nevertheless, this would enable a parallelized
> array "map" function that's safe to use. In the absence of "real"
> multithreading, this kind of parallelism would be a boon for
> applications like 3d games, or image processing.
>   

This little comment got lost in the recent deluge of emails, but I too
would really like some mechanism to avoid or see if a function causes
side effects (and not just mutability).


More information about the Es-discuss mailing list