brendan at mozilla.com
Thu Dec 4 14:03:29 PST 2008
On Dec 4, 2008, at 12:39 PM, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote:
> Brendan Eich wrote:
>> On Dec 4, 2008, at 10:22 AM, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote:
>>> Sam Ruby wrote:
>>>> So now the question is: where are we now?
>>> For the time being, concentrating on other things that will be in
>>> That was the main point of removing Decimal, no?
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org has more bandwidth than singular focus on 3.1.
Good, since we have harmonious energy for lambda syntax on this list
(you do, at any rate -- so do I, don't get me wrong -- but let's play
fair with Decimal for Harmony as well as Lambda for Harmony).
> but there is no longer any current detailed spec for Decimal to
> comment on.
Sam pointed that out too, and directed everyone to his test-
implementation results page:
Indeed we still have an open issue there ignoring the wrapper one:
> I think the only major outstanding semantic issue was wrapper
> objects; apart from that, the devil was in the detail of spec wording.
No, the cohort/toString issue remains too (at least).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Es-discuss