Allen's lambda syntax proposal
jaz at bu.edu
Wed Dec 3 19:25:44 PST 2008
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Eric Suen <eric.suen.tech at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, it doesn't contain a lambda expression, just like:
> a = x
> is not same as:
> a = x;
> they both right but has different meaning...
Okay -- so we agree. In that case, it's clear that your proposed syntax:
has the same problem, right? Any valid ES3 infix operator will have
the same problem, if we use it as a prefix lambda operator.
More information about the Es-discuss