Allen's lambda syntax proposal
eric.suen.tech at gmail.com
Wed Dec 3 19:16:42 PST 2008
Yes, it doesn't contain a lambda expression, just like:
a = x
is not same as:
a = x;
they both right but has different meaning...
>> Because it is a xor expression, for lambda, it will be
>> x = x * x ^ ^ (a,b,c,d,e,f,g)
> I don't understand what you're getting at. That's a syntax error. My
> x = x * x
> is not a syntax error, but it also (unfortunately) doesn't contain a
> lambda expression. Or am I missing something?
More information about the Es-discuss