Allen's lambda syntax proposal

Michael Michael at
Wed Dec 3 15:30:53 PST 2008

Just so there is no confusion on meaning, I'm not referring to let
statements nor let definitions but to this portion in particular:

-----Original Message-----
From: zenpsycho at [mailto:zenpsycho at] On Behalf Of Breton
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 5:26 PM
To: Michael
Subject: Re: Allen's lambda syntax proposal

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Michael <Michael at> wrote:
> This may be a stupid question, but is the current let expression syntax
> defined in JavaScript 1.7 too fundamentally different from the sought out
> lambda expression to be repurposed? Or would this wreak havoc on current
> uses?

I had kind of a similar thought about let statements. Would it be
possible to simply turn a let statement into an assignable/callable
value? Would that just break too many things? would it get us at least
close to the lambda functionality we seek?

More information about the Es-discuss mailing list