Allen's lambda syntax proposal

Brendan Eich brendan at mozilla.com
Wed Dec 3 10:51:40 PST 2008


On Dec 3, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Steven Johnson wrote:

> On 12/2/08 7:11 PM, "Neil Mix" <nmix at pandora.com> wrote:
>
>> How's this for a strawman: the choice is to follow either Objective-C
>> or Smalltalk.  Given that Objective-C and JS share syntactical roots
>> in C, it makes more sense to follow the Objective-C precedent.
>
> I find Objective-C's syntax to be its weakest point, so I'm not sure  
> I think
> either one of these is a good idea.
>
> My question is whether a new keyword (or token) is needed for lambda  
> at all.
> Can't the existing "function" keyword be repurposed here?

How? ES3 already defines function expressions as well as definitions.  
They are not the lambdas we seek.

/be


More information about the Es-discuss mailing list