Es-discuss - several decimal discussions
brendan at mozilla.org
Sun Aug 24 19:01:31 PDT 2008
On Aug 24, 2008, at 6:51 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.org>
>> Why is eq being proposed whatever happens with Decimal?
> Because in the absence of decimal, === is close enough to an
> "identical" test that one can practically code around the problem
> cases (NaN and -0)
You're assuming 1.0m === 1.00m must be true. I'm disputing that (see
exchange with Sam, who may agree).
>> We've been over this before, === is an equivalence relation
>> excluding NaN.
>> It happens to put 0 and -0 in the same equivalence class. Why this
>> is a
>> problem has yet to be demonstrated (add hashcode and then we can
>> talk ;-).
> Until we add either hashcode or decimal, we can postpone the whole
I'm trying to avoid too much creature feep in any edition ;-). Other
languages have near-universally-quantified hashcode analogues but
solve NaN dilemmas by throwing (Python, IIRC). We can enlarge the
language to be strictly more expressive, or we could enlarge
equivalence classes under ===, or we could choose to make certain
seemingly equal numbers !==. The rationale for excluding the last two
alternatives when mooting Object.eq is not clear.
More information about the Es-discuss