return when desugaring to closures
petermichaux at gmail.com
Thu Aug 21 17:39:42 PDT 2008
Dave Herman wrote:
> We all know about the benefits of specification by desugaring. (I do
> know a thing or two about macros, ya know.) But desugaring only works
> when the feature you want really *does* layer properly on top of an
> existing feature. The simple reason we haven't specified `let' as a
> desugaring into `function' is because we want them to behave differently.
Who is "we"?
Brendan seemed to invite discussion about the semantics of let.
If the committee has reached consensus then those outside the committee
could save time and keystrokes and focus on other things where there is
How do outsiders know which proposals have reached committee consensus?
More information about the Es-discuss