Es4-discuss Digest, Vol 8, Issue 44
wycats at gmail.com
Tue Oct 30 15:59:49 PDT 2007
There's a difference between meeting minutes of the WG and the discussions
that need to occur now in the development community. If ES4 is to succeed, a
chunk of the development community needs to get behind it (and at least not
be actively opposed to it). The insider baseball that's been occurring for
the last two years is not particularly useful to the development community
(no, I am not going back to read two years worth of minutes). It would be
extremely helpful to get a coherent set of the concerns about ES4 (Doug's
"consequences") so that interested parties outside of the WG can get a sense
of what's going on technically.
I would specifically like to hear a realistic technical scenario where the
implementation of ES4 produces serious complications in the open web.
On 10/30/07, Robert Sayre <sayrer at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/30/07, Douglas Crockford <douglas at crockford.com> wrote:
> > It has serious consequences that should be discussed.
> Well, it looks like there are two years of meeting minutes on the
> wiki. Do the details of these consequences appear anywhere in the
> minutes? If not, now is the time to get very specific, or get out of
> the way.
> Robert Sayre
> "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
> Es4-discuss mailing list
> Es4-discuss at mozilla.org
Web Developer | Procore Technologies
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Es4-discuss