[TLUG]: ECMAScript ("Javascript") Version 4 - FALSE ALARM
Chris Pine
chrispi at opera.com
Tue Oct 30 10:13:32 PDT 2007
Ric Johnson wrote:
> Please note that Microsoft HAS responded on my blog (with a reply from
> Brendon and myself)
>
> http://openajax.com/blog/
Yes, I read that. I am extremely doubtful that Microsoft is suddenly so
concerned about browser compatibility for the benefit of the web. (When
IE passes the Acid 2 test, let's talk again.)
It's nice that MS has constructed this document identifying browser
differences. But frankly, this is too little, too late. We are
painfully aware of the significant differences. Suggesting that we all
sit down and strive to fix every last trivial discrepancy under the
guise of "browser compatibility" is manipulative and, from a business
standpoint, absurd. It is an unnecessary task that would never be
completed.
In essence, it is just another stalling tactic.
Chris Pine
Opera Software
More information about the Es4-discuss
mailing list