[TLUG]: ECMAScript ("Javascript") Version 4 - FALSE ALARM

Ric Johnson Cedric at OpenDomain.Org
Sun Oct 28 20:39:46 PDT 2007

Im sorry to post this here, after being a lurker for so long, but I just
had to respond.

I put my comment on my blog:

This is not SPAM: I do not use any Advertising or profit.  This is only
to promote the OpenWeb and I wanted to make it public.

Please feel free to respond

Ric johnson

On 10/29/2007, "Andrew Dupont" <andrew at andrewdupont.net> wrote:

>On Oct 28, 2007, at 7:36 PM, Robert Sayre wrote:
>> On 10/28/07, Douglas Crockford <douglas at crockford.com> wrote:
>>> As responsible stewards of the language, we should...
>> ...discuss technical issues. I encourage you to begin doing so.
>I can see this escalating very quickly, so let me try to get ahead of
>Douglas, would you be satisfied if only the name were changed and
>nothing else? Or is the underlying issue the perceived scope creep and
>personality change from ES3 to ES4? Robert (and others) have responded
>as though it were the former. But it feels like the latter; if so
>let's frame it that way.
>> --
>> Robert Sayre
>> "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
>> _______________________________________________
>> Es4-discuss mailing list
>> Es4-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
>Es4-discuss mailing list
>Es4-discuss at mozilla.org

More information about the Es4-discuss mailing list