Rule 317

[David Teller]

Ok, I think I'm now understanding something that I had completely missed
about that syntax: it's LR(1). I was assuming it was something much more
complicated with unlimited backtracking.

Dumping my code and restarting the parser with lighter tools...

Thanks and cheers,
 David

On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 19:20 +0200, liorean wrote:
> On 23/10/2007, David Teller <David.Teller at univ-orleans.fr> wrote:
> > So I guess this could just be handled by making this rule have a lowest
> > priority ?
> 
> Not really. In statement context, a function without a name should be
> a syntax error

-- 
David Teller ------------------------------------------
Security of Distributed Systems -----------------------
Project JStify: Static Analysis for JavaScript 2  -----
-- http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller
----- Laboratoire d'Informatique Fondamentale d'Orleans