Separating a Hash type from Object

[Kris Zyp]

Just out of curiosity does Tamarin currently use copying GC?
Kris


On 5/8/07, es4-discuss-request at mozilla.org <es4-discuss-request at mozilla.org>
wrote:
>
> Send Es4-discuss mailing list submissions to
>        es4-discuss at mozilla.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        es4-discuss-request at mozilla.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        es4-discuss-owner at mozilla.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Es4-discuss digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Separating a Hash type from Object (Igor Bukanov)
>   2. Re: Separating a Hash type from Object (Igor Bukanov)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Igor Bukanov" <igor at mir2.org>
> To: "Peter Hall" <peter.hall at memorphic.com>
> Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 23:13:08 +0200
> Subject: Re: Separating a Hash type from Object
> On 07/05/07, Peter Hall <peter.hall at memorphic.com> wrote:
> > implemented in Tamarin. ES4 is supposed to be
> > implementation-independant. There are many factors that could make a
> > feature harder or easier (or just more or less desirable) to implement
> > in a given implementation - choice of GC seems to be a big factor in
> > this instance, but there are plenty of others.
>
> Yet ES4 adds intrinsic::hashcode which imposes more overhead  when
> implementation uses GC  then a native Dictionary class. See recent
> discussion about that.
>
> So why it is so? I.e why rejecting Dictionary while requiring
> intrinsic::hashcode?
>
> Regards, Igor
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Igor Bukanov" <igor at mir2.org>
> To: "Peter Hall" <peter.hall at memorphic.com>
> Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 23:14:11 +0200
> Subject: Re: Separating a Hash type from Object
> On 07/05/07, Igor Bukanov <igor at mir2.org> wrote:
> > On 07/05/07, Peter Hall <peter.hall at memorphic.com> wrote:
> > > implemented in Tamarin. ES4 is supposed to be
> > > implementation-independant. There are many factors that could make a
> > > feature harder or easier (or just more or less desirable) to implement
> > > in a given implementation - choice of GC seems to be a big factor in
> > > this instance, but there are plenty of others.
> >
> > Yet ES4 adds intrinsic::hashcode which imposes more overhead  when
> > implementation uses GC  then a native Dictionary class. See recent
>                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> I meant copying Garbage Collector.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Es4-discuss mailing list
> Es4-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20070508/31835e6a/attachment-0002.html