Lars T Hansen
lth at acm.org
Fri Mar 16 05:39:59 PDT 2007
On 3/16/07, P T Withington <ptw at pobox.com> wrote:
> On 2007-03-16, at 05:23 EDT, Lars T Hansen wrote:
> > The use case for object IDs seems less clear.
> To visually distinguish otherwise similar objects in a debugger, for
> If the language does not support object ID's internally, say in the
> introspection interface, you have a choice of maintaining a table
> (which the GC may already be doing), or annotating (but also
> polluting) the object (which the GC also may already be doing, but in
> a pollution-free manner). So, while you can simulate object ID's, it
> should be cleaner and more efficient to provide an introspection
> interface to them. (I'm not suggesting that hashcode should be the
> object ID, just that you might want to support object ID's.)
I actually thought the meta-object proposal was flagged "optional",
but it's now mandated, otherwise I'd propose adding object IDs there.
Still, that'd be the best place for the functionality, as you suggest.
More information about the Es4-discuss