some generator issues

[Neil Mix]

>> The unwieldy part being that you're required to set
>> arguments.generator to a local var because otherwise the arguments
>> object gets masked.  But this could be simplified a little if you
>> could obtain a send() delegate directly from the generator object:
>
> Wouldn't Function.prototype.bind
> (http://developer.mozilla.org/es4/proposals/static_generics.html) be
> sufficient for this?

Yes, although a bit wordy as you point out.

> It's definitely wordier, but the user could also easily implement your
> delegate() method above by adding it to Function.prototype.

I don't follow -- did you mean Generator.prototype?

> Alternatively, we could make gen.next() and gen.send() special in that
> they are already prebound to gen (e.g. gen.send.call(anotherGen) still
> results in gen.send()). Personally, I'd rather not do this - pretty  
> much
> all builtin classes have unbound prototype methods rather than bound
> instance methods.

Agreed.