bob at redivi.com
Fri Oct 20 12:51:36 PDT 2006
On 10/20/06, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.org> wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2006, at 3:36 PM, Erik Arvidsson wrote:
> > If Date is serialized as an ISO strings the process of encoding and
> > decoding loses information. If Dates are added to JSON then they
> > should be encoded using new Date(ms). However Dates are not supported
> > in JSON today and removing them from JS2 seems OK.
> ES4 also standardizes Date.parse to accept the same ISO 8601 date
> strings, so I don't believe any information is lost.
Even if there wasn't, you can always turn strings into dates the hard
way as MochiKit does...
The important part is that the metadata that it is a date is lost,
even if there's an easy way to make dates from strings. You have to
know which strings should be treated as dates.
> You're right that this automatic encoding of Date objects as ISO
> strings does not result, when decoding, in Date objects again.
> Fixing that would require a pass over the decoded structure, or a use
> of the optional object hook on the enclosing object. Is this a problem?
The object hook would be no good here because it would have to be able
to find ISO strings by key (or regexing all string values looking for
More information about the Es4-discuss